Skip to main content

Service Areas

National Reach, Local Expertise

HOA Total Access provides specialized software across all 50 states, including Canada and Mexico. While our platform is a powerful, all-in-one toolkit, we customize our approach to meet the unique statutory requirements of your specific state.

Alabama

Digital Transparency for Alabama Boards. Community associations in Alabama are embracing modern tools for communication.

Alabama Homeowners Association Act
Key Cities: Huntsville, Birmingham, Montgomery, Mobile

Alaska

Digital Transparency for Alaskan Boards. Community associations in Alaska are moving their governance online to stay organized.

Alaska Common Interest Ownership Act
Key Cities: Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau

Arizona

Arizona communities feature extensive desert landscaping and shared amenities that require high-frequency maintenance logging.

A.R.S. Title 33
Key Cities: Phoenix, Scottsdale, Mesa, Chandler, Gilbert, Glendale, Tucson, Peoria

Arkansas

Empowering Arkansas Neighborhood Boards. Volunteer boards in Arkansas are moving to professional digital portals.

Arkansas Horizontal Property and Nonprofit Acts
Key Cities: Little Rock, Fayetteville, Fort Smith

California

California's Davis-Stirling Act is the most complex set of HOA laws in the country. Administrative burden on CA boards is immense.

Davis-Stirling Act
Key Cities: Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose, San Francisco, Irvine, Sacramento, Riverside, Anaheim, Fremont, Santa Ana

Colorado

Accountability for Colorado HOAs. Under HB 22-1137, Colorado boards face strict new requirements for delinquency notices and record-keeping.

Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (CCIOA)
Key Cities: Denver, Colorado Springs, Aurora, Fort Collins

Connecticut

Modern Governance for CT Associations. Connecticuts Common Interest Ownership Act sets a high bar for transparency.

CT Common Interest Ownership Act (CIOA)
Key Cities: Bridgeport, Stamford, Hartford

Delaware

Modern Governance for Delaware Boards. Delawares DUCIOA requires associations to be highly transparent.

Delaware Uniform Common Interest Act
Key Cities: Wilmington, Dover, Newark

District of Columbia

Modern Governance for the Nation's Capital. Community associations in Washington D.C. require secure, transparent tools to manage complex urban developments and...

D.C. Condominium and Nonprofit Corporation Acts
Key Cities: Capitol Hill, Georgetown, Navy Yard

Florida

Florida has the highest density of community associations in the U.S. compliance with Florida’s strict reserve funding and transparency laws is mandatory.

Chapter 720 (HOA) & Chapter 718 (Condo)
Key Cities: Miami, Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Sarasota, Naples, Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, Tallahassee, West Palm Beach

Georgia

Georgia communities benefit from the POAA which streamlines lien enforcement for non-paying members.

Georgia Property Owners' Association Act (POAA)
Key Cities: Atlanta, Johns Creek, Alpharetta, Marietta, Decatur, Savannah, Sandy Springs, Roswell

Hawaii

Modern Solutions for Hawaii Associations. Hawaii boards have a statutory responsibility to maintain accurate records.

Hawaii HRS Chapter 514B
Key Cities: Honolulu, Hilo

Idaho

Streamlining Idaho Neighborhood Governance. Idaho boards are looking for better ways to manage community records.

Idaho Homeowners Association Act
Key Cities: Boise, Meridian

Illinois

Digital Accountability for Illinois Associations. The Illinois Condominium Property Act requires boards to keep meticulous records.

Illinois Condo Property Act (Section 18.5)
Key Cities: Chicago, Aurora, Naperville

Indiana

Empowering Indiana Board Members. Modern Indiana associations are looking for better ways to communicate with residents.

Indiana Homeowners Association Act
Key Cities: Indianapolis, Fort Wayne, Carmel

Iowa

Professional Records for Iowa Boards. Community associations in Iowa are moving their governance online to stay organized.

Iowa Horizontal Property and Nonprofit Acts
Key Cities: Des Moines, Cedar Rapids

Kansas

Streamlining Kansas Neighborhood Governance. Kansas boards are looking for better ways to manage community records.

Kansas Common Interest Owners Rights Act
Key Cities: Wichita, Overland Park

Kentucky

Empowering Bluegrass Neighborhoods. Volunteer boards in Kentucky are looking for professional ways to manage their records.

Kentucky Horizontal Property and Condo Acts
Key Cities: Louisville, Lexington

Louisiana

Transparency for Louisiana Neighborhoods. Louisiana associations require robust tools to manage unique legal requirements.

Louisiana Homeowners Association Act
Key Cities: New Orleans, Baton Rouge

Maine

Digital History for Maine Communities. Maine boards have a responsibility to keep accurate, long-term records.

Maine Condominium and Nonprofit Acts
Key Cities: Portland

Maryland

Meeting New Maryland Mandates. Recent changes to Maryland law regarding reserve studies have placed more responsibility on board members.

MD Real Property Code (HOA/Condo Acts)
Key Cities: Baltimore, Frederick, Annapolis

Massachusetts

Digital Accountability for MA Boards. Massachusetts boards have a statutory duty to maintain accurate records.

Massachusetts Condo Law (Chapter 183A)
Key Cities: Boston, Worcester

Michigan

Digital History for Michigan Communities. Michigan boards have a responsibility to keep accurate, long-term records.

Michigan Condominium and Nonprofit Acts
Key Cities: Detroit, Grand Rapids, Ann Arbor

Minnesota

Digital Governance for the North Star State. Minnesotas Common Interest Ownership Act places specific duties on board members.

MN Common Interest Ownership Act
Key Cities: Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Rochester

Mississippi

Modern Tools for Mississippi Neighborhoods. Community associations in Mississippi require efficient ways to share information.

Mississippi Condo and Nonprofit Acts
Key Cities: Jackson, Gulfport

Missouri

Streamlined Records for Missouri Boards. Missouri boards have enough on their plate without chasing down paperwork.

Missouri Nonprofit and Condo Acts
Key Cities: Kansas City, Saint Louis, Springfield

Montana

Empowering Big Sky Neighborhood Boards. Volunteer boards in Montana are moving to professional digital portals.

Montana Unit Ownership Act
Key Cities: Billings, Missoula

Nebraska

Professional Tools for Nebraska Boards. Community associations in Nebraska are moving online to increase transparency.

Nebraska Condo and Nonprofit Acts
Key Cities: Omaha, Lincoln

Nevada

State-Mandated HOA Portals for Nevada. Nevada NRS 116.31069 mandates that all Common-Interest Communities with 150 or more units maintain a secure website.

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 116
Key Cities: Las Vegas, Henderson, Reno

New Hampshire

Accountability for NH Associations. New Hampshire boards have a duty to maintain accurate records and share them with owners.

NH RSA 356-B Condominium Act
Key Cities: Manchester, Nashua

New Jersey

Fair Governance for New Jersey HOAs. The Radburn Law changed how New Jersey associations handle board elections.

NJ Radburn Law Amendments
Key Cities: Newark, Jersey City, Paterson, Trenton

New Mexico

Transparency for New Mexico Communities. The New Mexico Homeowners Association Act places specific duties on board members.

New Mexico Homeowners Association Act
Key Cities: Albuquerque, Las Cruces, Santa Fe

New York

Digital Transparency for New York Boards. NY associations must manage records in compliance with the Condominium Act.

NY Condominium Act (Article 9-B)
Key Cities: New York City, Buffalo, Albany

North Carolina

North Carolina has seen a massive surge in HOAs within the Research Triangle and Charlotte metro areas.

NC Planned Community Act (Chapter 47F)
Key Cities: Charlotte, Raleigh, Durham, Greensboro, Winston-Salem, Asheville, Wilmington, Cary

North Dakota

Modernized Governance for ND Boards. Volunteer boards in North Dakota need efficient tools to manage community records.

ND Condo and Nonprofit Acts
Key Cities: Fargo, Bismarck

Ohio

Empowering Ohio Neighborhood Boards. Ohio boards are adopting professional digital portals for better governance.

Ohio Condominium Act (Chapter 5311)
Key Cities: Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati

Oklahoma

Modern Governance for Oklahoma Boards. Oklahoma community associations are embracing digital tools to improve communication.

Oklahoma Real Estate Development Act (60 §§851–858)
Key Cities: Oklahoma City, Tulsa

Oregon

Modernized Governance for Oregon Boards. Volunteer boards in Oregon need efficient tools to manage community records.

Oregon Revised Statutes Chapters 94 and 100
Key Cities: Portland, Salem, Eugene

Pennsylvania

Modern Governance for PA Associations. Pennsylvania law requires associations to be transparent with their financial records.

PA Uniform Planned Community Act
Key Cities: Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Allentown, Harrisburg

Rhode Island

Modern Governance for RI Communities. Rhode Islands Condominium Act sets high standards for association transparency.

Rhode Island Condominium Act
Key Cities: Providence, Warwick

South Carolina

Transparency for South Carolina Neighborhoods. The SC Homeowners Association Act requires boards to be diligent about recording rules.

South Carolina Homeowners Association Act
Key Cities: Charleston, Columbia, Greenville, Myrtle Beach

South Dakota

Professional Records for SD Associations. Community associations in South Dakota are moving their governance online.

SD Condo and Nonprofit Acts
Key Cities: Sioux Falls, Rapid City

Tennessee

Helping Tennessee Neighborhoods Thrive. Volunteer boards in Tennessee are moving away from outdated spreadsheets to digital portals.

TN Horizontal Property and Nonprofit Acts
Key Cities: Nashville, Memphis, Knoxville, Chattanooga

Texas

Texas is the second-largest market for HOAs, driven by explosive growth in suburbs surrounding Austin, Dallas, and Houston.

Chapter 209 (Texas Property Code)
Key Cities: Houston, Austin, Dallas, San Antonio, Frisco, Plano, The Woodlands, Fort Worth, Leander, Pearland

Utah

Streamlining Utah Neighborhood Governance. Utah boards must manage community records with precision to stay compliant.

Utah Community Assoc. and Condo Acts
Key Cities: Salt Lake City, West Valley City, Provo

Vermont

Modern Governance for Vermont Communities. Vermonts Common Interest Ownership Act sets high standards for transparency.

Vermont Common Interest Ownership Act
Key Cities: Burlington

Virginia

Streamlined Governance for Virginia. Virginia boards are under constant pressure to deliver resale disclosure packets and manage records.

Virginia Property Owners Association Act
Key Cities: Virginia Beach, Norfolk, Richmond, Alexandria

Washington

Standardizing Washington Community Law. Starting in 2026, the WUCIOA for All phase-in impacts how every Washington association handles meetings and notices.

WA Uniform Common Interest Act (WUCIOA)
Key Cities: Seattle, Spokane, Tacoma, Vancouver

West Virginia

Digital Governance for WV Associations. West Virginia community boards are embracing digital tools to improve communication.

WV Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act
Key Cities: Charleston, Huntington

Wisconsin

Professional Tools for Wisconsin Boards. Modern Wisconsin associations are moving their governance online to save time.

Wisconsin Condominium and Nonprofit Acts
Key Cities: Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay

Wyoming

Digital Transparency for Wyoming Boards. Community associations in Wyoming are embracing modern tools for better communication.

Wyoming Condo and Nonprofit Acts
Key Cities: Cheyenne, Casper

Legal Notice & Disclaimer

This directory provides summaries and references to state-specific statutes and various Nonprofit Corporation Acts for general informational purposes only. HOA Total Access, LLC is a software technology provider; we are not a law firm, and the information contained herein does not constitute legal advice, legal opinions, or the establishment of an attorney-client relationship.

Community association laws are subject to frequent legislative updates, judicial rulings, and varying local interpretations. While we endeavor to keep our multi-state database current, we make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statutory references provided. All users are strictly advised to verify current regulations through official state legislative portals or consult with a qualified attorney licensed in their specific jurisdiction before making governance decisions.